Not proven in one case.Gents, he was found not guilty by an independent Jury.
Therefore he is innocent.
As the case was behind closed doors, we probably will never know the full story.
Alex certainly didn't come across as squeaky clean from what was reported.
But neither did the accusers.
There was clear collaboration there.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the long run.
Think you're right, you could probably add sex pest to his list of qualities. That wasn't what he was tried for though.Agreed Jack, and it was one of the more serious ones, I've always liked not proven. My interpretation is that possibly done it, but no credible evidence to back it up. However legally, it just means innocent. Hes a smug obnoxious bully in my opinion, but a lot of the case didn't stack up for me.
I heard yesterday that Prince Charles was self isolating at Balmoral with Camilla whilst Prince Andrew was self isolating at home with a 16 year old called Sharon. Who is the more responsible?At least he faced a court unlike Prince Andrew
Salmond is a master of maximising his income stream.Salmond going to write another book on how he has been treated. Wonder if the moneys will go through his other book company. It is a great way to save tax. Legal but is it right.