Thanks Thanks:  11
Likes Likes:  73
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38
  1. #1

    Default A fewew questions on Flamerthrowers

    I decided to tie a few flamethrowers on some new to me Patriot size 8 singles to see how the hooks tie and whether I could do a decent job on the pattern.
    As it is not a fly i would normally use or tie I have a few questions.
    Is the shape ok and is it impacted by tying on a single?
    I have not put the pearl head on the majority of them - do people see it as important?
    It is not clear from the sources, including the inventor's SBS https://flyfishing-and-flytying.co.u...w/a_new_flame/ if the black section of the body has a rib or is left plain. What is the normal tying? to me it looks a bit strange without a rib.
    i found it difficult to get a satisfactory head on the patriot - seems you need to leave considerably more space behind the eye than normal or else the thread encroaches too far over the eye. Have others had the same issue?
    Attachment 41770
    Attached Images Attached Images fts-d-jpg 

  2. #2

    Default

    Those will fish just fine.

    I have never bought a patriot hook of any kind, either single or double, as I am not particularly drawn to them. I feel they are too expensive and I'm not overly fussed on the shape nor am I a fan of black nickel hooks. When I see the green and red hooks they've produced I cringe. Why could they not have put the same effort into producing a proper black hook? The mind boggles.

    I was sent a few singles to try in larger sizes and I found them OK to tie on.

    Personally, I find single hooks do not look as good for Flamethrowers as doubles. That is a personal opinion and I know for a fact that the fish don't mind as I've caught fish on Flamethrowers tied on singles. I've never used a shiny head either for my own flies.

    I never really liked one wing tied in the middle so I always split my wing and tie half in the middle and half at the front under the hackle. It allows for different colours to be used too.

    As I said, your Flamethrowers will definitely catch fish. That is not in question.

    Edit: I've always ribbed the front half too.
    Last edited by Jockiescott; 15-01-2020 at 02:07 PM.
    One of the best skills that an angler can ever develop is knowing the difference between passing the time and wasting it!

  3. #3

    Default

    Personal opinion only, but taking your points in order:

    Quote Originally Posted by Slaneybs View Post
    I decided to tie a few flamethrowers on some new to me Patriot size 8 singles to see how the hooks tie and whether I could do a decent job on the pattern.
    As it is not a fly i would normally use or tie I have a few questions.
    1.Is the shape ok and is it impacted by tying on a single?
    2.I have not put the pearl head on the majority of them - do people see it as important?
    3.It is not clear from the sources, including the inventor's SBS https://flyfishing-and-flytying.co.u...w/a_new_flame/ if the black section of the body has a rib or is left plain. What is the normal tying? to me it looks a bit strange without a rib.
    4.i found it difficult to get a satisfactory head on the patriot - seems you need to leave considerably more space behind the eye than normal or else the thread encroaches too far over the eye. Have others had the same issue?
    1. The profile look fine to me, and they'd all catch fish without a doubt. I like the top one best; the dressing (esp. the hackles) on the bottom one is a bit too flared out for my taste, though this would no doubt be rectified once it's in the water. And I know that the original instructions say not to stack the bucktail in order to keep a nice taper, but again the wing on the bottom one is a bit too wispy for me. I'd be inclined to give it a bit of a hand stack - though you certainly want to avoid the paintbrush look. I haven't tried flamethrowers on singles, but to my eyes they suit Patriot doubles well (JS and I may disagree on the subject of Patriots; I like the shape and really love the black nickel finish, though I'm with him on the red or green ones!).

    2. I do give my flamethrowers a pearl head, but that's really just out of respect to Duncan Egan, and I do try to respect an original tying where possible. It's a little fiddly, but I'm not tying commercially, so don't mind an extra minute or two in the tying. I doubt the fish care much!

    3. I think the original doesn't have a rib on the front body. We're all so used to seeing ribbed bodies that it can look a bit odd during the tying, but in reality the dressing covers it (looking at your picture, I can just see a glint of ribbing on the third one, but can't tell whether you've ribbed the top two or not). Personally, I often use some sort of sparkly dubbing on the front section, as it's hard to avoid this being a bit cone-shaped which i don't like, and the dubbing helps to hide that. But again I doubt it really makes any difference to the fish.

    4. I don't particularly find space at the head a problem with Patriots, but it can be with Flamethrowers, whatever hook you use. My first efforts at the style ended up too congested, and you do need to leave lots of space. I can still get this wrong when I start to tie a batch.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Belfast/Derry
    Posts
    7,934

    Default

    I have to say the Flamethrower was one that I found difficult to get the proportions on right, at the start as well. Eventually I just tyed a Tailfire type fly but put the tail above the middle hackle. But to answer your questions

    1. Your flies are fine and yes the fly profile will be impacted depending on whether you use a double, a single or varying brands of hooks. Most brands will differ in their hooks and Singles generally have a slightly longer shank than doubles of the same size, so the fly often wont look as “dumpy” on a single if you're tyeing to the hook and not the fly. if you know what I mean.

    2. To catch fish no, to stay true to the original yes. My most successful variant, which is a McCormick's style FL, had simply a black head no pearl tinsel and tyed on No.11 Gold Salar.


    3. If using floss on the front body I wont rib but if using a lite bite type dubbing I will. I find Dubbing with a fine rib helps keep the bulk down but I rarely rib the rear section these days. I use braid or UTC over coloured thread with a dab of superglue underneath on both.

    4. As I said in my opening paragraph, I struggled with the proportions when starting to tye this fly. Doubles were particularly bad due to being a bit shorter on the shank than most singles. It’s why I sat down with the tail-less Tailfire in mind to try and get the proportions right as I was doing these fine but everything went skewiff when I moved the tail slightly up the shank for some reason. Eventually with practise it comes but Even now it would take 3 flies maybe even half dozen of this style or any for that matter before I get my bearings again I reckon. Its weird the way your eyes dial in and out on your tyeing.
    Ye Cannae help bein' a wee bit grumpy, No if ye was jist born crabbit

  5. #5

    Default

    I've been looking back through some of the Flamethrowers I've tied. I'll be honest in saying that it is not a style I tie or fish too often.

    I haven't tied too many of Duncan Egan's original types. The last ones I did tie were a few years ago and sold for charity. On those, I did use a shiny head.

    Most FT types I've tied in recent years were variants of Irish Shrimps or other colour combinations of established patterns. I had a fish this season past on an Ally's Shrimp with the tail moved to the middle. Was this then a Flamethrower? I'm not sure but I didn't use a shiny head. Another I've tied was based on the Green Silk Irish Shrimp and just used a black head.

    So, it appears that I would use a shiny head if attempting some of Duncan's originals but for my own variants, I don't.

    FP, the McCormick's tied as a FT is deadly! 😉
    One of the best skills that an angler can ever develop is knowing the difference between passing the time and wasting it!

  6. #6

    Default Thanks

    Jockie, Charlie H and FP
    Thanks to the 3 of you for the speedy helpful responses.
    That's what I like about this forum you can always be sure of a positive response unless of course you are looking for a comment from either side of the Brexit or C&R debates - and even there most people (with one or two exceptions) are polite and considered.
    Thanks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Belfast, Northern Ireland
    Posts
    3,441

    Default

    they look good Slaney and as others have said I have no doubt all will catch.

    My personal preference would be for the profile of your first, though the second is the closest to the 'wedge shape' of Duncan's originals. I saw him tying them years back at an GAC open day and he was quite particular that they should have this overall swept back wedge look as it gives the classic teardrop profile.

    Its a style that I like tying but for some reason don't actually fish that much with them - like others I like to do a variant with a front wing as well as the middle one. I also like to use a pearl tinsel rib over the black body as it shines out nicely between the hackles. From memory Duncan's didn't have a front rib and I think he said it didn't really matter as his are tied quite densely (front hackle in particular) and so you don't see much of the under front body.

    The front tinsel heads look nice but can be a right pain to tie and also sometimes aren't the most durable fishing wise. Again personally I found the key to tying them consistently was to make the head as level as possible, any significant slope at all and its very hard to keep the tinsel from slipping.

    Here's a spring Flamethrower I tied a while back - again a variant with the black front wing. The heads are even more tricky on down eyes as the tinsel will do its level best to try and slip down over the eye

    black-yellow-flamethrower-2-jpg

    And same fly in the lightbox and with a proper camera

    spring-ff-jpg
    Last edited by easky; 15-01-2020 at 03:12 PM.
    so much fishing, so little time


    <a href="Hidden Content style="text-decoration:underline;">Andrew - Loop Akademi Fly Dresser</a>

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by easky View Post
    Here's a spring Flamethrower I tied a while back - again a variant with the black front wing. The heads are even more tricky on down eyes as the tinsel will do its level best to try and slip down over the eye

    Attachment 41774

    And same fly in the lightbox and with a proper camera

    Attachment 41776
    Thanks Easky - the attachments don't seem to have made it unfortunately.

  9. #9

    Default

    Second one has just appeared. I like that a lot

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Belfast, Northern Ireland
    Posts
    3,441

    Default

    the uploading was playing silly beggars there.. should be there now
    so much fishing, so little time


    <a href="Hidden Content style="text-decoration:underline;">Andrew - Loop Akademi Fly Dresser</a>

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •